I'm surprised to read that the original guideline is being moderated in an inverse way compared to how it's written.
Reading the original guidline itself, I'd think "we should be sharing stuff about that" not "we shouldn't be sharing things that criticise that". Interpreting it that way, or writing it one way with the intent to moderate it in another way, seems disingenous to me.
So I think moving it to a comment rather than a guideline is a better move.
(Beside the point, but what's with calling them "guidelines" when they're clearly "rules"?)